|
May 3, 2006--
Illegal
Immigration must be stopped to counter 21st Century's emerging "Hitler-Stalin" Pacts-- an alliance
between Islamo-Fascists And Paleo-Stalinists.
Given the pre-World-War-II Hitler-Stalin pact in the
20th Century, it requires little, if any, imagination to "connect the dots" revealing our
porous borders as an evolving tool for the 21st Century's emerging "Hitler-Stalin" pact
between Hitler-and-Stalin-Wannabes (i.e., Islamo-Fascists And Paleo-Stalinists,
which I call "IFAPS") founded on
the time-tested principle of warfare, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." Here's a
partial roster: Islamo-Fascists
And Paleo-Stalinists (IFAPS) Hitler-Wannabes:
Al Qaeda's Usama bin Laden, Abu Musab al Zarqawi,
and Ayman Zawahiri; Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Mohammad Khatami; Hamas' Ismail Haniyeh;
Islamic Jihadists; and Hezbollahs. Stalin-Wannabes:
North Korea's Kim Jong Il; Venezuela's Hugo
Chavez; Cuba's Fidel Castro; Bolivia's Evo Morales; Nicaragua's 2006-Election-Wannabe, Daniel
Ortega°¹;
and back-channel supporters in the Kremlin and in Beijing. Here's
the Scenario for the IFAPS Pact:
During (or in the wake of) the gradual collapse of Islamo-Fascism and Baathist-Stalinism in Iraq,
the "Hitler-Wannabes" (minus Zarqawi) and "Stalin-Wannabes" will act upon their
mutual acceptance of "The enemy of my enemy (the United States) is my friend" as a
guiding principle for asymmetrical warfare against the United States (and its Western allies).
While China and the Kremlin veto Western proposals for sanctions against Iran, the CACASAPS (Central
American, Caribbean, And South American Paleo-Stalinists°²)
and the Islamo-Fascists in Iran will strike an oil-for-forbearance and Caribbean-oil-drilling-rights
bargain with China for China's toleration (if not covert support) of CACASAPS covert support of
an "indigenous liberation" of Panama and the
Panama Canal (while preserving de-facto Chinese°³
control of the ports on both ends of the Canal).
Then (or even in the absence of the Panama scenario described supra) the CACASAPS will seek
to spread "indigenous" rebellions throughout South America, Central America, and Mexico.
Then the IFAPS Axis will infiltrate Paleo-Stalinists and/or Islamo-Fascists into the United States in an effort
to destabilize and/or terrorize the "evil, capitalistic, imperialistic" (and/or the "Great
Satan") United States.
In the interim, Canada will continue its self-Frenchification. Europe will become increasingly
cowed by the increasingly Fundamentalist-Muslim character of its population. (This is what Libyan
leader Mu'ammar
Al-Qadhafi Muamar Ghadaffi -- "may
his spellings be many" -- predicts in a video.)
(Hat-tip LGF.)
England will
begin fearing isolation from Europe more than disengagement from its historic alliance with the
United States. South Korea (and North Korea) will become increasingly doubtful that the United
States would militarily respond if North Korea were to invade South Korea (or were to blackmail South Korea
with its real or feigned possession-of/willingness-to-use nuclear weapons).
The United Nations will not do anything to cause Iran to abandon its nuclear-armament
strategy. Iran will intensify its asymmetrical warfare against Israel while continuing to
threaten its extermination, continuing its alliance-of-convenience with CACASAPS against the
United States, and continuing its development of nuclear weapons to match the Holocaustic Rhetoric
of its leaders.
The United States' most dependable allies in the war against the IFAPS Axis
will become India, Israel and Japan. Australia will continue to vacillate between (a) being cowed by
the growing power of the new anti-Western IFAPS Axis (including the Pacific-Asian Islamo-Fascists
and Paleo-Stalinists such as North Korea and its silent partner, China) and (b) continuing its alliance with the
United States. (Nevertheless, I think Australia will ultimately embrace the latter rather than the former.)
When China becomes reasonably confident that the United States would not respond to China's invasion
of Taiwan with any military measure, China will invade Taiwan, unless it were to first procure Taiwan's capitulation by
threat of overwhelming force without any prospect of rescue by the United States. Given the
grief inflicted on Bush by his political opposition in the United States for his actions in
Afghanistan and Iraq, China probably already believes the United States would not make any effective
response to China's envelopment of Taiwan.
All this will leave the United States an isolated island in a multi-polar 21st Century struggle
between Western Civilization (i.e., human-rights-respecting democracies) on the one hand and the
IFAPS Axis on the other, with the latter having overt or covert access to
nuclear weapons coupled with the expectation of being able to use them anonymously
against the United States and its allies. It will be the Cold War to the Third
Exponential Power without
the "saving grace" of a MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) theory to prevent it from
becoming a Super-Hot War (as was the case in the bi-polar Cold War).
The hot flash igniting a Super-Hot War will be a nuclear bomb detonated within the United States without there being a
clearly-identified culprit. The Fascist/Stalinist regimes controlling each nation-state within the
IFAPS Axis will have plausible deniability while the United States decides
whether to wait for the next nuclear shoe to drop. Is
this Nightmare Scenario Preventable?
Can the United States prevent this nightmare scenario? If so, how? It would be possible,
but not easy. There are at least Twelve Commandments for the success of such strategy: First,
we must recognize that effective control of our borders is a matter of national survival, not
merely a matter of economic/social/political choice. Too many Americans' soft-hearted
sympathy for Mexicans entering the United States illegally for a better life lead them to condemn
the "Minute Men" as "vigilantes," but for most of such Americans, if they were
to discover strange people routinely trespassing on their property in their
own neighborhoods and were to find the police either unable or unwilling to do anything about it,
they'd take action to protect their property and safety and they'd call it "Neighborhood
Watch" rather than "vigilantism." See [http://polisat.com/du2005/du0504-11--20.htm#20050420-01]
and [http://polisat.com/Video/NeighborhoodWatch-WMV.wmv] Second,
we must give the approximately 12-million illegal aliens already here a set of disincentives and
incentives calculated to increase the chances they would ultimately choose to become loyal Americans rather than collaborators with the
CACASAPS: (a)
We must immediately begin, and continue, aggressively enforcing existing federal laws making
it a criminal offense for anyone (including a citizen) to falsify a
government document generally (or a Social Security document in particular) for
fraudulent-identification purposes. (See, for example, 18
USC §1028; see also 42
USC §405, 42 USC §408, 42 USC §1307
& 8 USC §1360 -- these are
some, but not all, federal laws criminalizing identity fraud.) These
enforcement actions must include computerized cross-checking of Social Security numbers in
employment documents and tax forms against Social Security Administration information, birth
records, death records and immigration records. Such actions (and prosecutions) must be
highly publicized. (b)
We must establish a guest-worker program (which concept Bush first proposed in 2000) to enable those
preferring not to play "Russian Roulette" as to whether they will become ensnared in
enforcement procedures in "(a)" to obtain guest-worker permits to serve as a
"defense" against criminal enforcement by converting such offenses into a civil penalties
(in a specified monthly amount) to be automatically deducted incrementally from lawful guest-worker
wages for the one year longer than the time period during which such person worked illegally
in the United States. However, the terms of such "guest worker" program should
abrogate such "defense" against criminal prosecution for any "guest worker" who falsely
understates the period of time(s) during which such worker worked illegally in the United
States. This program also should provide an alternative under which the monthly incremental
payments would be tripled with the duration of such payment period to equal half the aggregate
number of years during which such guest worker previously worked illegally in the United
States. (Other fine-tuning would, of course, be necessary.) (c)
Recognizing how much we admired the risks and dangers endured by the "Vietnamese Boat
People" and by Cubans escaping from the clutches of Castro, and recognizing also that although
conditions in Mexico would not justify "political asylum" grounds obviously available to
those fleeing Vietnam and Cuba, the pervasive corruption in the Mexican governmental system
motivates honorable, hard-working people to flee into the United States to seek a life of freedom in
a non-corrupt society, we should afford people honorable enough to follow option "(b)"
above an opportunity to commence the ordinary, citizenship-application process with the procedures
to begin one year after full satisfaction of option "(b)" and to
follow the same procedures as would be applicable to anyone else lawfully seeking citizenship. (d)
We should recognize that Mexicans willing to seek citizenship after satisfying option "(b)"
would have thereby demonstrated that they would be assets to our country and ultimately deserving of
citizenship under option "(c)." Third,
we must expend resources to enable liberal-democratic forces in Nicaragua to prevail over the
Sandinistas in their November 5, 2006, election. Fourth,
we must succeed in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Fifth,
we must successfully support liberal-democratic forces in Iran to restrain (if not topple) the
Islamo-Fascists now controlling that country. Sixth,
we must maintain our alliance with Israel. Seventh,
we must at least double the size of our military resources. Eighth,
we must strengthen our relations with all remaining liberal-democratic countries in Central and
South America and must find ways to help Mexico into a human-rights-respecting, prosperous future. Ninth,
we must continue developing nuclear-tipped bunker-busters, anti-missile systems, and
warplane-mounted chemical-lasers (now close to deployment). Tenth,
we must develop the means to detect nuclear "signatures" of whatever kinds of nuclear
bomb-making that may become within the respective capabilities of North Korea, Iran, Pakistan (home
of A. Q. Kahn), and any (every) other nation-state possessing such technology, and once we've
developed such means, we must (a)
reveal/explain such means to the world, (b)
make clear that in the event of any nuclear attack on the United States (other than by a missile
with a trajectory trackable to its point of origin), we will retaliate
in-kind-to-the-third-exponential power against the nation-state whose nuclear weaponry were to match such
"signature," (c)
convey to the world that in such scenario, we would consider such nation-state's failure to keep
such weapons out of the hands of terrorists to be sufficient justification for such retaliation
(remember, "You're wither with us or with the terrorists"?), and (d)
make it clear that as a matter of national survival, we're prepared to ignore demands for more
fastidious, law-enforcement-type proof in identifying such "signature." Eleventh,
throughout the coming decades we must remain determined and resolute that Western Civilization (i.e.,
human-rights-respecting democracies) will ultimately prevail over medieval Islamo-Fascism and Paleo-Stalinism. Twelfth,
we must never forget that ultimate success or failure in this struggle will depend primarily upon
the United States-- preferably in an alliance with other human-rights-respecting democracies, but
alone if necessary.
Too many of our natural allies (i.e., human-rights-respecting democracies) are too easily
cowed by the ruthlessness of the IFAPS Axis. It's time for the IFAPS Axis to learn that our
instinct for survival (not "conquest") makes us ruthless in our pursuit of them so
our (and the world's) posterity inherits human-rights-respecting, democratic forms of government
rather than medieval Islamic Fascism and/or Stalinism Redux. --Jim
Wrenn, Editor at WrennCom.Com; Editor at PoliSat.Com. PS--
If you're interested in supporting a video tribute to our troops, and if you have a
high-speed connection, go to http://polisat.com/TION4DIONatHQS.htm
or http://polisat.com/TION4DIONat150k.htm,
but if you have a low-speed connection go to http://PoliSat.Com/Thanks.htm. Editor's
Note: To facilitate understanding of the geographic components of the world-wide struggle
between freedom and the IFAPS Axis, I've added below the links to a series of maps. Africa
(map) [http://worldatlas.com/webimage/countrys/af.htm] Asia
(map) [http://worldatlas.com/webimage/countrys/as.htm] Australia
(map) [http://worldatlas.com/webimage/countrys/au.htm] Caribbean
Countries: Cuba, Jamaica, Virgin Islands, etc. (map)
[http://worldatlas.com/webimage/countrys/carib.htm] Central
American Countries: Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua,
&
Panama. (map) [http://worldatlas.com/webimage/countrys/camerica.htm] Europe
(map) [http://worldatlas.com/webimage/countrys/eu.htm] Middle
East (map) [http://worldatlas.com/webimage/countrys/me.htm] North
American Countries: Canada, USA & Mexico. (map)
[http://worldatlas.com/webimage/countrys/na.htm] Pacific-Asian
Nations (map) [http://worldatlas.com/webimage/countrys/as.htm] South
American Countries: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay,
and
Venezuela. (map) [http://worldatlas.com/webimage/countrys/sa.htm] °¹·
Many observers think Daniel Ortega and the Sandinistas have a better than even chance of regaining
control in Nicaragua's elections scheduled for November 5, 2006. This includes Latin
American news outlets, British
news outlet (Reuters), American
pundits, Leftist
Media Organs, and Paleo-Stalinist
Media Organs. °²·
The CACASAPS are: Cuba's Fidel Castro; Nicauraga's Dictator-Wannabe, Daniel Ortega; Bolivia's Evo Morales;
and Venezuela's Hugo Chavez.
°³·
Ports at each end of the Panama Canal are currently owned and operated by a Chinese
(HongKong) company, Hutchison-Whampoa Ltd., which is now at the mercy of Beijing.
Permanent link to this
Commentary:
[http://WrennCom.Com/CommentaryArchives/2006/20y06m05d03-01.asp]
Jim Wrenn is Editor at
WrennCom.Com and Editor at PoliSat.Com. His Clinton Liebrary
Book is available at http://ClintonLiebraryBook.Com.
end
|
