·support our troops, support Bush, support Cheney, support victory in Iraq, support victory in Afghanistan,
Salute America's Heroes, support Fallen Heroes Fund, oppose Global Warming theory, oppose Al Gore, support milblogs,
support Michael Yon, support Pat Dollard, support BlackFive, support MilBlogs, support MilBlogging,
support Mudville Gazette, support HotAir.Com, support JawaReport, support PajamasMedia, support VictoryCaucus,
support VetsForFreedom, support FreedomsWatch, support DayByDayCartoon, support Foundation for the Defense of Democracy,
support polisatDOTcom video, Political Satire, Politics, News, oppose MoveOn.Org, oppose Code Pink, oppose DailyKos,
oppose ANSWER, support http://PoliSat.Com, support http://WrennCom.Com, oppose Clinton Library, support Clinton Liebrary,
support http://ClintonLiebrary.Com, support http://ClintonLiebraryBook.Com, support ICANN, oppose terrorism, oppose jihadists,
oppose energyandcapital.com, oppose justforeignpolicy.org .
political ideology stands at war with the "new mindset" for family
values and personal responsibility he espouses to NAACP.
If Obama were able willing to
apply to his own political ideology generally the "new mindset" he
recommended to the NAACP on July
16, 2009 as excerpted in the CNN video below, he would be a
limited-government "conservative" instead of a collectivist. He
thus could become a great president rather than one attempting to drive the
nation pedal-to-the-metal over the edge of the free-market/personal-liberty
plateau and into the bottomless pit of collectivism.
But, of course, he's unwilling to do so. No doubt he's intellectually
capable of recognizing the patent disconnect between the "new mindset"
he recommends to the NAACP and his own leftist/collectivist/statist/socialist
political ideology that he also naively applies internationally as Jimmy
Carter on steroids
melanin. Nevertheless, instead of embracing the
limited-government principles inherent in, and intrinsic to, the "new
mindset" he recommends in his July 16, 2009 speech to the NAACP, he
embraces and seeks to implement a "redistribution of wealth" political
philosophy in all three branches of government -- legislative,
and executive-- as though it were a benevolent
philosophy rather than an inherently
Since one can't reasonably doubt that he understands such disconnect, how can
one explain his embrace of a political ideology that is virtually antithetical
to the "new mindset" he advocates to the NAACP? Even his
staunchest critics would concede that barring some "Sanford-type"
secret, Obama's handling of his marital and parental responsibilities admirably
exemplify the "mindset" he recommends to others. What's so sad
is that a leader who appears to personify loyalty to "family values"
embraces a political ideology so plainly hostile to promotion and preservation
of, and respect for, such values in the form of the free-market/personal-liberty
paradigm that made the country he "inherited" from George W. Bush the
greatest force for human liberty in all of human history.
What makes it tragic is that he's in the process of squandering that legacy in
pursuit of what seems almost indistinguishable from the long-discredited 18th
Century utopian philosophies which Marx later sought to describe, and prescribe,
as a form of evolutionary "science." No wonder the person
Obama selected as his "science" czar is a person whose political
philosophy is at home in such 18th Century Utopian thought as it would be on
Animal Farm or in a fascist
or Stalinist or Maoist state.
Editor at WrennCom.Com; also Editor at PoliSat.Com.