|
·support our troops, support Bush, support Cheney, support victory in Iraq, support victory in Afghanistan,
Salute America's Heroes, support Fallen Heroes Fund, oppose Global Warming theory, oppose Al Gore, support milblogs,
support Michael Yon, support Pat Dollard, support BlackFive, support MilBlogs, support MilBlogging,
support Mudville Gazette, support HotAir.Com, support JawaReport, support PajamasMedia, support VictoryCaucus,
support VetsForFreedom, support FreedomsWatch, support DayByDayCartoon, support Foundation for the Defense of Democracy,
support polisatDOTcom video, Political Satire, Politics, News, oppose MoveOn.Org, oppose Code Pink, oppose DailyKos,
oppose ANSWER, support http://PoliSat.Com, support http://WrennCom.Com, oppose Clinton Library, support Clinton Liebrary,
support http://ClintonLiebrary.Com, support http://ClintonLiebraryBook.Com, support ICANN, oppose terrorism, oppose jihadists,
oppose energyandcapital.com, oppose justforeignpolicy.org .
http://PoliSat.Com

Focus on News, Politics, etc.
by Jim Wrenn, Editor
(March 8, 2000)
Campaign
2000:
Lessons from Iowa Caucus to Super Tuesday..
What lessons can be learned from Iowa through Super Tuesday?
1. Money may be necessary but it's not sufficient absent a message acceptable to
the electorate. Ask Steve Forbes.
2. Being a favorite of, or being portrayed favorably by, the media would be
sufficient absent adversaries possessing sufficient money to procure media time
to offset effects of media favoritism. Ask John McCain.
3. Reliance upon intellectual curiosity among voters to inform themselves about
the positions of candidates across the entire spectrum of issues by listening to
debates, reading the newspapers, and otherwise "keeping up" with the
news, social issues and political issues out of a sense of civic-minded duty is
patently insufficient. Ask Bill Bradley.
4. Role-playing, stressing "hot-button" issues, and outright lying is
sufficient when one's opponent limits his strategy to #3 is sufficient to
achieve victory over such opponent even when he has as much, if not more, money.
Ask Al Gore.
5. When attacked by an opponent using tactics impugning one's motives and/or
integrity (i.e., favoring tax cuts to "benefit the rich"), one must
respond in kind and aggressively-- otherwise, one will be defined by caricature.
Ask George W. Bush.
Back to Index for Editorial
Focus.
|